Counterargument on texting

The planet hasn't devolved into an ongoing clash between super-states, and U.

Counterargument on texting

Opinion Inconvenient truths to a ban on texting while driving In Ohio, heated debate accompanied the move to ban texting while driving. Who could oppose such a thing? Ah, but then the law of unintended Counterargument on texting put a whole new light on the controversy.

Yahoo ist jetzt Teil von Oath

Op-ed contributor Jim Sollisch writes about a ban on texting while driving: By Jim Sollisch Cleveland Ohio is the latest state to propose a ban on texting while driving. Media outlets in the state report there was a heated debate on the Senate floor.

Who could possibly be opposed to a ban on texting while driving?

And you know where that will lead: This one, based on a few studies and a bit of counter-intuition, is far more interesting. The argument goes like this: The Highway Data Loss Institute, an affiliate of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safetyfound that in 3 of 4 states that enacted texting bans, accidents actually increased after the ban went into effect.

The study analyzed insurance claims for accidents in four states — CaliforniaLouisianaMinnesotaand Washington — during several months before the ban and several months after.

In Minnesota, accidents actually increased 9 percent after the texting ban went into effect. The study also looked at states that had not enacted bans as a control. Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. Seems difficult to argue against the idea that better helmets would lead to fewer head injuries.

Counterargument on texting

But the truth is just the opposite. In fact, rugby players who wear no head gear suffer fewer concussions than football players. Perversely, the way to reduce concussions may be to ban helmets, not make them better.

An unintended consequence of technology has been the blurring of the boundaries between work and home. If we repeal the expected ban, that act will have its own set of unintended consequences: More people may believe that texting while driving is safe, which could lead to more people texting, which could lead to even more accidents.

Ah, the unintended consequence of unintended consequences. Jim Sollisch is creative director at Marcus Thomas Advertising.Argument texts should be balanced and fair, and give all sides of an argument before coming to a conclusion.

Here's an extract from an argument text: Foxhunting is a subject that provokes very. May 17,  · A phone is held in a car in Brunswick, Maine.

Op-ed contributor Jim Sollisch writes about a ban on texting while driving: 'It's hard to see the downside of such a thing. Students need to learn how to evaluate both sides of an argument or a debate.

Watch a high school English class go through a lesson that teaches how to read, discuss and debate 2 sides of an argument. Covers CCSS, to delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text. By John Coleman, The Founder of The Weather Channel It is the greatest scam in history.

I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it.

Persuasion texts

Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 's to create an allusion of rapid global warming. Free counter argument when silence is betrayalabout the vietnam war,by martin luther king papers, essays, and research papers.

My Account. Your search returned over essays for "counter argument when silence is betrayalabout the vietnam war,by martin.

Copy of Good readers can identify argument and counter argument of a Copy of LLHB13_a_ArgumentativeWritingIntro_ KEY Copy of LLHB13_a_ArgumentativeWritingIntro Copy of 11 10 10 Teacher Notebook Counterargument Example Copy of persuasive essay Copy of Transition Words Copy of LP-week docx.

Creating Argument Outlines